Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Belarus
53.49 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
44.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
99th
Zimbabwe rank
102nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Belarus
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300196319932023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 53.49 current US$ per square kilometre against 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 8.63 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 171 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 90.47 current US$ per square kilometre 52.96 current US$ per square kilometre 37.51 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 69.27 current US$ per square kilometre 98.52 current US$ per square kilometre 29.25 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 112.88 current US$ per square kilometre 83.63 current US$ per square kilometre 29.25 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Belarus or Zimbabwe?
Belarus, at 53.49 current US$ per square kilometre against 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
8.63 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Belarus ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/zimbabwe/">Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.