Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
44.86 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 44.6%
World rank
102nd
of 171 countries
All-time high
154.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1993
All-time low
0.0775 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1966
Years of data
60
1963–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Zimbabwe, 1963–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Zimbabwe stood at 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 44.6% on the previous year and down 45.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Zimbabwe peaked at 154.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993 and was at its lowest, 0.0775 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1966.
Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 171 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | 0.1551 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.2326 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1965 | 0.1809 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0775 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 1968 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +5166.7% |
| 1969 | 0.1034 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.5% |
| 1970 | 0.2068 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1971 | 0.4911 current US$ per square kilometre | +137.5% |
| 1972 | 0.6721 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.8% |
| 1973 | 0.4911 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.9% |
| 1974 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +268.4% |
| 1975 | 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.9% |
| 1976 | 4.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 1977 | 5.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1978 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.9% |
| 1979 | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1980 | 21.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +596.6% |
| 1981 | 54.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +161.0% |
| 1982 | 59.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1983 | 88.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.5% |
| 1984 | 68.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.9% |
| 1985 | 70.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1986 | 105.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.5% |
| 1987 | 114.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1988 | 103.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1989 | 70.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1990 | 127.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.2% |
| 1991 | 128.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1992 | 151.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1993 | 154.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1994 | 66.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.7% |
| 1995 | 108.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1996 | 78.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.6% |
| 1997 | 99.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1998 | 41.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.5% |
| 1999 | 21.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.8% |
| 2000 | 32.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.1% |
| 2001 | 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2002 | 26.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2003 | 30.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2004 | 40.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.0% |
| 2005 | 34.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2006 | 25.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 2007 | 50.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +95.9% |
| 2008 | 64.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 2009 | 89.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.7% |
| 2010 | 85.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2011 | 151.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.8% |
| 2012 | 146.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2013 | 81.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.3% |
| 2014 | 91.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2015 | 72.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 2016 | 92.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.5% |
| 2017 | 77.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2018 | 115.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.3% |
| 2019 | 70.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 2020 | 94.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.7% |
| 2021 | 113.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 2022 | 81.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2023 | 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8057 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0775 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1970s | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2068 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 75.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 114.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 97.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 154.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 42.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 89.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 98.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 70.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 151.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 83.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 113.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 99 Belarus 53.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 100 Sudan 50.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 101 Türkiye 49.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 103 Malaysia 43.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 104 Dominican Republic 43.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 105 Mexico 42.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zimbabwe
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 75,834 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 331,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 7.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 9.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17.35 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.26 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 36.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 575,259 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 12.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Zimbabwe?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Zimbabwe was 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 154.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0775 current US$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Zimbabwe ranks 102nd out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 45.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 60 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.