Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Türkiye
49.77 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
44.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Türkiye rank
101st
Zimbabwe rank
102nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Türkiye
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 49.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Türkiye ahead.

Türkiye ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Türkiye averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Türkiye Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 28.27 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8057 current US$ per square kilometre 27.47 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye
1970s 89.04 current US$ per square kilometre 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre 86.66 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye
1980s 189.16 current US$ per square kilometre 75.79 current US$ per square kilometre 113.37 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye
1990s 86.54 current US$ per square kilometre 97.83 current US$ per square kilometre 11.29 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s -34.89 current US$ per square kilometre 42.06 current US$ per square kilometre 76.96 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 292.29 current US$ per square kilometre 98.52 current US$ per square kilometre 193.76 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye
2020s 211.05 current US$ per square kilometre 83.63 current US$ per square kilometre 127.42 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Türkiye or Zimbabwe?
Türkiye, at 49.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Türkiye and Zimbabwe?
4.91 current US$ per square kilometre, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and Zimbabwe?
60 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Türkiye and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Türkiye ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/turkiye/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/turkiye/zimbabwe/">Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.