Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Mexico
42.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
44.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
105th
Zimbabwe rank
102nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Mexico
  • Zimbabwe
-50050100150196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre against 42.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 2 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 171 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4853 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8057 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3204 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 2.37 current US$ per square kilometre 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0057 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 7.71 current US$ per square kilometre 75.79 current US$ per square kilometre 68.08 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre 97.83 current US$ per square kilometre 91.03 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 12.84 current US$ per square kilometre 42.06 current US$ per square kilometre 29.22 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 92.7 current US$ per square kilometre 98.52 current US$ per square kilometre 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s -2.53 current US$ per square kilometre 83.63 current US$ per square kilometre 86.16 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Mexico or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre against 42.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Mexico and Zimbabwe?
2 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zimbabwe?
60 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Mexico ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/zimbabwe/">Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.