Congo vs Gabon: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Congo
1.98 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gabon
2.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
153rd
Gabon rank
152nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Congo
  • Gabon
0100200300196219922023

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.25 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 153rd and Gabon ranks 152nd of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Gabon in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Gabon Difference Ahead
1960s 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre 2.59 current US$ per square kilometre 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre Gabon
1970s 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre 6.66 current US$ per square kilometre 4.98 current US$ per square kilometre Gabon
1980s 16.5 current US$ per square kilometre 5.3 current US$ per square kilometre 11.2 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 26.69 current US$ per square kilometre 6.66 current US$ per square kilometre 20.03 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 31.27 current US$ per square kilometre -0.8965 current US$ per square kilometre 32.17 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 36.11 current US$ per square kilometre -2.27 current US$ per square kilometre 38.38 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7561 current US$ per square kilometre Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Congo or Gabon?
Gabon, at 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Congo and Gabon?
0.25 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Gabon?
60 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Congo and Gabon rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Congo ranks 153rd and Gabon ranks 152nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Gabon: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/gabon/">Congo vs Gabon: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.