Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Congo
Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1.98 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 41.3%
World rank
153rd
of 171 countries
All-time high
293.91 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
-0.7906 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Years of data
61
1963–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Congo, 1963–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Congo stood at 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 41.3% on the previous year and down 10.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Congo peaked at 293.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, -0.7906 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2008.
Congo ranks 153rd of 171 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Congo, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | 0.1464 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.6442 current US$ per square kilometre | +340.0% |
| 1965 | 0.4978 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 1966 | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +435.3% |
| 1967 | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.4% |
| 1968 | 0.9078 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.3% |
| 1969 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1970 | 0.7321 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 1971 | 4.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +448.0% |
| 1972 | 0.7028 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.5% |
| 1973 | 0.8492 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 1974 | 0.2928 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.5% |
| 1975 | 0.6149 current US$ per square kilometre | +110.0% |
| 1976 | 0.6149 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +152.4% |
| 1978 | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.5% |
| 1979 | 4.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.0% |
| 1980 | 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.9% |
| 1981 | 6.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 1982 | 12.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.9% |
| 1983 | 18.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.6% |
| 1984 | 19.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1985 | 15.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 1986 | 15.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1987 | 17.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1988 | 24.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.0% |
| 1989 | 22.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1990 | 19.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1991 | 21.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1992 | 32.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 1993 | 38.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1994 | 36.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1995 | 24.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 1996 | 19.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1997 | 23.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1998 | 39.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.4% |
| 1999 | 11.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.1% |
| 2000 | 6.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 2001 | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.1% |
| 2002 | 7.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.6% |
| 2003 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.3% |
| 2004 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 2005 | 186.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +12155.8% |
| 2006 | 11.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.1% |
| 2007 | 16.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.7% |
| 2008 | -0.7906 current US$ per square kilometre | -104.7% |
| 2009 | 75.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -9666.7% |
| 2010 | 27.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.7% |
| 2011 | 293.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +970.0% |
| 2012 | 27.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.6% |
| 2013 | 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.0% |
| 2014 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2015 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2016 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2017 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 2018 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 2019 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2020 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2021 | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 2022 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.2% |
| 2023 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1464 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 1970s | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2928 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 26.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 31.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7906 current US$ per square kilometre | 186.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 36.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 293.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 150 Colombia 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 151 Turkmenistan 2.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 152 Gabon 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 154 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 155 Botswana 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 156 Sao Tome and Principe 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 18,209 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 891,418 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.80 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 35.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 542,370 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 677,421 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 96.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 42,394 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 3.01 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Congo?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Congo was 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 293.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.7906 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- How does Congo rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Congo ranks 153rd out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.