Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.24 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 156th of 171 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.3565 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.31 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1980s | 38.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 183.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 144.73 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1990s | 15.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 795.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 780.83 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 49.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.23 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.23 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 0.8052 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5417 current US$ per square kilometre | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.24 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2020.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 156th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.