Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Equatorial Guinea, 1979–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Equatorial Guinea is 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 63.2% on the previous year and up 0.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Equatorial Guinea peaked at 71.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0.1874 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2015.
That places Equatorial Guinea 157th out of 171 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1979 | 0.3565 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 17.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +4700.0% |
| 1981 | 38.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.0% |
| 1982 | 37.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1983 | 36.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1984 | 52.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.7% |
| 1985 | 41.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 1986 | 37.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1987 | 19.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.6% |
| 1988 | 50.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +164.8% |
| 1989 | 55.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1990 | 71.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.8% |
| 1991 | 47.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1992 | 16.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.4% |
| 1993 | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.9% |
| 1994 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1995 | 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1996 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 1997 | 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.3% |
| 1998 | 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2000 | 0.713 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2002 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 2008 | 0.713 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2009 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2010 | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2011 | 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 2012 | 0.5592 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.4% |
| 2013 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.2% |
| 2014 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.9% |
| 2015 | 0.1874 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.6% |
| 2016 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +1142.6% |
| 2017 | 0.9933 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.3% |
| 2018 | 0.7465 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2019 | 0.5282 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.2% |
| 2020 | 0.8052 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.4% |
| 2021 | 0.2634 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.3% |
| 2022 | 0.6806 current US$ per square kilometre | +158.4% |
| 2023 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.3565 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3565 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3565 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1980s | 38.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 15.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 71.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.713 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 2010s | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1874 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7149 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2634 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
- 154 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 155 Botswana 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 156 Sao Tome and Principe 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 158 Belize 0.7861 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 159 Saudi Arabia 0.7117 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 160 Suriname 0.492 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Equatorial Guinea
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10,110 current US$ (2018)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 110,000 current US$ (2012)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 114,922 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 201,568 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 5,439 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 31,151 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 26,669 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 4,534 current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 777,023 current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Equatorial Guinea?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Equatorial Guinea was 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 71.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1874 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 39 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.