Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Belize
0.7861 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
1.11 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
158th
Equatorial Guinea rank
157th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Belize
  • Equatorial Guinea
020406080197419982023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.7861 current US$ per square kilometre in Belize, a difference of 0.3239 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.4 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Belize ranks 158th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th of 171 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre 42.02 current US$ per square kilometre 40.26 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre 15.01 current US$ per square kilometre 9.18 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 3.4 current US$ per square kilometre 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2010s 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2020s 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7149 current US$ per square kilometre 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.7861 current US$ per square kilometre in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
0.3239 current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
35 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Belize ranks 158th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/equatorial-guinea/">Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.