Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Belize
Belize: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 0.7861 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Belize, 1974–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Belize stood at 0.7861 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 1.9% on the previous year and down 82.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Belize peaked at 15.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 1994 and was at its lowest, 0.4384 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1982.
That places Belize 158th out of 171 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Belize, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +250.0% |
| 1976 | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 1982 | 0.4384 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.5% |
| 1984 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 1985 | 0.8768 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1986 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1987 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1988 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1991 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 1993 | 8.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.0% |
| 1994 | 15.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.2% |
| 1995 | 6.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 1996 | 4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1997 | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1998 | 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.4% |
| 1999 | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2000 | 7.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2001 | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 2002 | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 2003 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2004 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 2006 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 2007 | 0.8768 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2008 | 0.8768 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2010 | 4.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +175.0% |
| 2011 | 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2012 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.0% |
| 2013 | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +330.4% |
| 2014 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.0% |
| 2015 | 0.7214 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.9% |
| 2016 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.2% |
| 2017 | 2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.1% |
| 2018 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.0% |
| 2019 | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +201.6% |
| 2020 | 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2021 | 4.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 2022 | 0.7714 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.0% |
| 2023 | 0.7861 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1980s | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4384 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 1990s | 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8768 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7214 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7714 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belize
- 155 Botswana 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 156 Sao Tome and Principe 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 157 Equatorial Guinea 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 159 Saudi Arabia 0.7117 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 160 Suriname 0.492 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 161 Argentina -1.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Belize
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 9,011 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 4.71 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 50,000 current US$ (2002)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 17,932 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6,401 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 74,520 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 3,518 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 750,439 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway 108,907 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Belize?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Belize was 0.7861 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Belize?
- The highest recorded value was 15.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 1994.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Belize?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4384 current US$ per square kilometre in 1982.
- How does Belize rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Belize ranks 158th out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Belize?
- Over the last ten years it is down 82.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belize data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.