Mozambique vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Mozambique
76.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
67.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
89th
Zambia rank
92nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Mozambique
  • Zambia
0100200300400196419932023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 76.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 8.71 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Mozambique ranks 89th and Zambia ranks 92nd of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3548 current US$ per square kilometre 9.96 current US$ per square kilometre 9.61 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 13.6 current US$ per square kilometre 39.63 current US$ per square kilometre 26.03 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 89.67 current US$ per square kilometre 105.73 current US$ per square kilometre 16.06 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 86.46 current US$ per square kilometre 132.77 current US$ per square kilometre 46.31 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 89.28 current US$ per square kilometre 46.59 current US$ per square kilometre 42.69 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 106.33 current US$ per square kilometre 71.26 current US$ per square kilometre 35.07 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Mozambique or Zambia?
Mozambique, at 76.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Mozambique and Zambia?
8.71 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Mozambique ranks 89th and Zambia ranks 92nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/zambia/">Mozambique vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.