Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Zambia
Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
67.9 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 11.0%
World rank
92nd
of 171 countries
All-time high
386.8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2006
All-time low
0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1964
Years of data
60
1964–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Zambia, 1964–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Zambia recorded 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is down 11.0% on the previous year and up 40.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Zambia peaked at 386.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1964.
Zambia ranks 92nd of 171 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Zambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.1749 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1966 | 0.148 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 1967 | 0.4305 current US$ per square kilometre | +190.9% |
| 1968 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +162.5% |
| 1969 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.2% |
| 1970 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1971 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1972 | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1973 | 9.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +287.8% |
| 1974 | 10.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1975 | 7.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.0% |
| 1976 | 5.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 1977 | 7.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.2% |
| 1978 | 23.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +221.0% |
| 1979 | 30.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 1980 | 47.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.8% |
| 1981 | 23.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.3% |
| 1982 | 38.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.0% |
| 1983 | 33.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 1984 | 25.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1985 | 25.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1986 | 43.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.7% |
| 1987 | 50.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1988 | 69.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.7% |
| 1989 | 37.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.7% |
| 1990 | 105.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +178.6% |
| 1991 | 152.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.8% |
| 1992 | 173.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1993 | 173.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1994 | 73.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.6% |
| 1995 | 95.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.2% |
| 1996 | 107.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1997 | 22.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.7% |
| 1998 | 67.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +195.0% |
| 1999 | 87.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.5% |
| 2000 | 150.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.4% |
| 2001 | 18.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.7% |
| 2002 | 59.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +220.2% |
| 2003 | 313.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +427.3% |
| 2004 | 48.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.5% |
| 2005 | 158.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +226.2% |
| 2006 | 386.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +143.4% |
| 2007 | 54.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.9% |
| 2008 | 61.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2009 | 74.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 2010 | 44.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.1% |
| 2011 | 53.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2012 | 45.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2013 | 48.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2014 | 51.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2015 | 43.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 2016 | 36.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2017 | 44.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 2018 | 53.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 2019 | 45.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2020 | 76.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.6% |
| 2021 | 63.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 2022 | 76.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 2023 | 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6053 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1970s | 9.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 39.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 105.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 173.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 132.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 386.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 46.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 71.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 63.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 76.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 89 Mozambique 76.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 90 Central African Republic 75.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Trinidad and Tobago 72.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 93 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 63.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 94 Tanzania, United Republic of 61.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 95 Myanmar 60.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 395,416 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 25.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 25.84 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Zambia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Zambia was 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 386.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Zambia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Zambia ranks 92nd out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 40.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 60 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.