Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Zambia
Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 102.00 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Zambia, 1971–2023
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Zambia stood at 102.00 million current US$.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 16.3% on the previous year and up 98.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Zambia peaked at 152.35 million current US$ in 2009 and was at its lowest, 40,000 current US$, in 1973.
Zambia ranks 51st of 172 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Zambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 170,000 current US$ | — |
| 1972 | 90,000 current US$ | -47.1% |
| 1973 | 40,000 current US$ | -55.6% |
| 1976 | 810,000 current US$ | +1925.0% |
| 1977 | 7.41 million current US$ | +814.8% |
| 1978 | 11.65 million current US$ | +57.2% |
| 1979 | 10.47 million current US$ | -10.1% |
| 1980 | 20.22 million current US$ | +93.1% |
| 1981 | 27.59 million current US$ | +36.4% |
| 1982 | 30.12 million current US$ | +9.2% |
| 1983 | 8.39 million current US$ | -72.1% |
| 1984 | 23.91 million current US$ | +185.0% |
| 1985 | 29.05 million current US$ | +21.5% |
| 1986 | 16.28 million current US$ | -44.0% |
| 1987 | 19.87 million current US$ | +22.1% |
| 1988 | 34.58 million current US$ | +74.0% |
| 1989 | 33.99 million current US$ | -1.7% |
| 1990 | 25.90 million current US$ | -23.8% |
| 1991 | 31.23 million current US$ | +20.6% |
| 1992 | 94.86 million current US$ | +203.7% |
| 1993 | 143.71 million current US$ | +51.5% |
| 1994 | 45.71 million current US$ | -68.2% |
| 1995 | 76.94 million current US$ | +68.3% |
| 1996 | 37.11 million current US$ | -51.8% |
| 1997 | 28.66 million current US$ | -22.8% |
| 1998 | 20.47 million current US$ | -28.6% |
| 1999 | 80.92 million current US$ | +295.3% |
| 2000 | 25.68 million current US$ | -68.3% |
| 2001 | 44.20 million current US$ | +72.1% |
| 2002 | 104.02 million current US$ | +135.3% |
| 2003 | 79.38 million current US$ | -23.7% |
| 2004 | 123.78 million current US$ | +55.9% |
| 2005 | 139.08 million current US$ | +12.4% |
| 2006 | 98.27 million current US$ | -29.3% |
| 2007 | 66.44 million current US$ | -32.4% |
| 2008 | 134.97 million current US$ | +103.1% |
| 2009 | 152.35 million current US$ | +12.9% |
| 2010 | 92.53 million current US$ | -39.3% |
| 2011 | 81.23 million current US$ | -12.2% |
| 2012 | 68.44 million current US$ | -15.7% |
| 2013 | 51.43 million current US$ | -24.8% |
| 2014 | 46.07 million current US$ | -10.4% |
| 2015 | 76.36 million current US$ | +65.7% |
| 2016 | 126.89 million current US$ | +66.2% |
| 2017 | 54.20 million current US$ | -57.3% |
| 2018 | 49.01 million current US$ | -9.6% |
| 2019 | 96.09 million current US$ | +96.1% |
| 2020 | 54.68 million current US$ | -43.1% |
| 2021 | 82.51 million current US$ | +50.9% |
| 2022 | 87.68 million current US$ | +6.3% |
| 2023 | 102.00 million current US$ | +16.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4.38 million current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 11.65 million current US$ | 7 |
| 1980s | 24.40 million current US$ | 8.39 million current US$ | 34.58 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 58.55 million current US$ | 20.47 million current US$ | 143.71 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 96.82 million current US$ | 25.68 million current US$ | 152.35 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 74.23 million current US$ | 46.07 million current US$ | 126.89 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 81.72 million current US$ | 54.68 million current US$ | 102.00 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
More aid effectiveness data for Zambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 395,416 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 25.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 25.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway 7.56 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Zambia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Zambia was 102.00 million current US$ in 2023, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 152.35 million current US$ in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 40,000 current US$ in 1973.
- How does Zambia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Zambia ranks 51st out of 172 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 98.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.