Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Zambia
Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 7.56 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Zambia, 1966–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Zambia recorded 7.56 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 32.1% on the previous year and down 84.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Zambia peaked at 79.13 million current US$ in 2011 and was at its lowest, 70,000 current US$, in 1967.
Zambia ranks 36th of 143 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Zambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 80,000 current US$ | — |
| 1967 | 70,000 current US$ | -12.5% |
| 1968 | 140,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1969 | 290,000 current US$ | +107.1% |
| 1970 | 690,000 current US$ | +137.9% |
| 1971 | 980,000 current US$ | +42.0% |
| 1972 | 1.12 million current US$ | +14.3% |
| 1973 | 4.53 million current US$ | +304.5% |
| 1974 | 2.64 million current US$ | -41.7% |
| 1975 | 4.75 million current US$ | +79.9% |
| 1976 | 6.07 million current US$ | +27.8% |
| 1977 | 7.61 million current US$ | +25.4% |
| 1978 | 6.92 million current US$ | -9.1% |
| 1979 | 8.78 million current US$ | +26.9% |
| 1980 | 10.54 million current US$ | +20.0% |
| 1981 | 8.68 million current US$ | -17.6% |
| 1982 | 13.82 million current US$ | +59.2% |
| 1983 | 16.13 million current US$ | +16.7% |
| 1984 | 15.97 million current US$ | -1.0% |
| 1985 | 16.68 million current US$ | +4.4% |
| 1986 | 28.71 million current US$ | +72.1% |
| 1987 | 31.94 million current US$ | +11.3% |
| 1988 | 40.24 million current US$ | +26.0% |
| 1989 | 34.94 million current US$ | -13.2% |
| 1990 | 55.29 million current US$ | +58.2% |
| 1991 | 51.57 million current US$ | -6.7% |
| 1992 | 50.36 million current US$ | -2.3% |
| 1993 | 33.20 million current US$ | -34.1% |
| 1994 | 51.19 million current US$ | +54.2% |
| 1995 | 35.13 million current US$ | -31.4% |
| 1996 | 30.57 million current US$ | -13.0% |
| 1997 | 37.22 million current US$ | +21.8% |
| 1998 | 31.84 million current US$ | -14.5% |
| 1999 | 27.35 million current US$ | -14.1% |
| 2000 | 24.79 million current US$ | -9.4% |
| 2001 | 20.81 million current US$ | -16.1% |
| 2002 | 29.05 million current US$ | +39.6% |
| 2003 | 35.60 million current US$ | +22.5% |
| 2004 | 37.36 million current US$ | +4.9% |
| 2005 | 48.97 million current US$ | +31.1% |
| 2006 | 66.22 million current US$ | +35.2% |
| 2007 | 74.42 million current US$ | +12.4% |
| 2008 | 73.27 million current US$ | -1.5% |
| 2009 | 62.69 million current US$ | -14.4% |
| 2010 | 54.05 million current US$ | -13.8% |
| 2011 | 79.13 million current US$ | +46.4% |
| 2012 | 51.92 million current US$ | -34.4% |
| 2013 | 49.40 million current US$ | -4.9% |
| 2014 | 30.20 million current US$ | -38.9% |
| 2015 | 22.27 million current US$ | -26.3% |
| 2016 | 14.34 million current US$ | -35.6% |
| 2017 | 12.09 million current US$ | -15.7% |
| 2018 | 9.80 million current US$ | -19.0% |
| 2019 | 7.43 million current US$ | -24.2% |
| 2020 | 5.36 million current US$ | -27.8% |
| 2021 | 5.51 million current US$ | +2.8% |
| 2022 | 11.13 million current US$ | +101.8% |
| 2023 | 7.56 million current US$ | -32.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 145,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | 290,000 current US$ | 4 |
| 1970s | 4.41 million current US$ | 690,000 current US$ | 8.78 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 21.77 million current US$ | 8.68 million current US$ | 40.24 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 40.37 million current US$ | 27.35 million current US$ | 55.29 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 47.32 million current US$ | 20.81 million current US$ | 74.42 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.06 million current US$ | 7.43 million current US$ | 79.13 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.39 million current US$ | 5.36 million current US$ | 11.13 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
More aid effectiveness data for Zambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 395,416 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 25.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 25.84 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Zambia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Zambia was 7.56 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 79.13 million current US$ in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 70,000 current US$ in 1967.
- How does Zambia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Zambia ranks 36th out of 143 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 84.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.