Myanmar vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Myanmar
60.84 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
67.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar rank
95th
Zambia rank
92nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Myanmar
  • Zambia
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 60.84 current US$ per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Zambia ahead.

Myanmar ranks 95th and Zambia ranks 92nd of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6053 current US$ per square kilometre 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1970s 17.05 current US$ per square kilometre 9.96 current US$ per square kilometre 7.09 current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1980s 56.85 current US$ per square kilometre 39.63 current US$ per square kilometre 17.22 current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1990s 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre 105.73 current US$ per square kilometre 102.71 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 7.92 current US$ per square kilometre 132.77 current US$ per square kilometre 124.85 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 94.48 current US$ per square kilometre 46.59 current US$ per square kilometre 47.89 current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 68.51 current US$ per square kilometre 71.26 current US$ per square kilometre 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Myanmar or Zambia?
Zambia, at 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 60.84 current US$ per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Myanmar and Zambia?
7.06 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zambia?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Myanmar ranks 95th and Zambia ranks 92nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/zambia/">Myanmar vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.