Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 61.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
61.25 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 54.0%
World rank
94th
of 171 countries
All-time high
151.82 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of stood at 61.25 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 54.0% on the previous year and down 27.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 151.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Tanzania, United Republic of 94th out of 171 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.158 current US$ per square kilometre | +1300.0% |
| 1963 | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +1892.9% |
| 1964 | 10.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +227.6% |
| 1965 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.4% |
| 1966 | 6.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.2% |
| 1967 | 4.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.1% |
| 1968 | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1969 | 3.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1970 | 4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1971 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.9% |
| 1972 | 7 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1973 | 10.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.7% |
| 1974 | 14.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.3% |
| 1975 | 32.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.4% |
| 1976 | 22.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 1977 | 33.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.3% |
| 1978 | 62.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.3% |
| 1979 | 90.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.3% |
| 1980 | 84.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1981 | 61.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 1982 | 66.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1983 | 40.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 1984 | 56.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.4% |
| 1985 | 37.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 1986 | 50.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.8% |
| 1987 | 67.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.9% |
| 1988 | 76.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1989 | 58.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.9% |
| 1990 | 69.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1991 | 84.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1992 | 77.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1993 | 81.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1994 | 72.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1995 | 75.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1996 | 66.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1997 | 66.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1998 | 124.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.4% |
| 1999 | 75.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.4% |
| 2000 | 39.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.8% |
| 2001 | 54.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.7% |
| 2002 | 26.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.8% |
| 2003 | 111.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +324.3% |
| 2004 | 63.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.8% |
| 2005 | 56.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2006 | 55.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2007 | 73.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 2008 | 98.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.5% |
| 2009 | 98.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2010 | 151.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.3% |
| 2011 | 105.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 2012 | 123.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2013 | 84.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 2014 | 58.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.6% |
| 2015 | 105.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.7% |
| 2016 | 58.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.5% |
| 2017 | 49.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2018 | 45.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2019 | 39.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2020 | 58.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 2021 | 70.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 2022 | 39.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.5% |
| 2023 | 61.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 28.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 90.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 60.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 84.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 79.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 66.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 124.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 67.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 111.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 82.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 151.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 57.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 70.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 91 Trinidad and Tobago 72.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 92 Zambia 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 93 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 63.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 95 Myanmar 60.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 96 Uzbekistan 57.42 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 97 Indonesia 56.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 37.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 34.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 54.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 121.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 16.94 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of was 61.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 151.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 94th out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is down 27.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.