Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per was 63.78 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Congo, Democratic Republic of the recorded 63.78 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is down 12.5% on the previous year and up 64.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the peaked at 262.07 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, -0.0441 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1969.
That places Congo, Democratic Republic of the 93rd out of 171 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0353 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +4837.5% |
| 1963 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1964 | 0.3176 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.8% |
| 1965 | 0.2647 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1966 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +445.0% |
| 1967 | 0.9925 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.2% |
| 1968 | 0.2426 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.6% |
| 1969 | -0.0441 current US$ per square kilometre | -118.2% |
| 1970 | 0.6308 current US$ per square kilometre | -1530.0% |
| 1971 | 0.3441 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.5% |
| 1972 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +328.2% |
| 1973 | 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.3% |
| 1974 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.8% |
| 1975 | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1976 | 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1977 | 6.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.2% |
| 1978 | 6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1979 | 8.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1980 | 16.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.4% |
| 1981 | 15.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1982 | 14.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 1983 | 13.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1984 | 11.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1985 | 8.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1986 | 17.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.4% |
| 1987 | 23.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 1988 | 22.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1989 | 19.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1990 | 49.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +152.2% |
| 1991 | 58.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1992 | 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.3% |
| 1993 | 10.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1994 | 12.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1995 | 15.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 1996 | 15.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1997 | 6.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.1% |
| 1998 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.4% |
| 1999 | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +338.8% |
| 2000 | 5.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2001 | 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2002 | 9.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.4% |
| 2003 | 238.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +2465.4% |
| 2004 | 26.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.1% |
| 2005 | 22.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2006 | 15.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 2007 | 27.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.4% |
| 2008 | 27 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2009 | 35.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 2010 | 34.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2011 | 41.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 2012 | 262.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +532.8% |
| 2013 | 38.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.2% |
| 2014 | 40.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2015 | 38.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2016 | 37.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2017 | 50.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 2018 | 62.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 2019 | 89.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.6% |
| 2020 | 77.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2021 | 84.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2022 | 72.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 2023 | 63.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7489 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0441 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3441 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 18.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 58.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 41.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 238.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 69.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 262.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 74.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 63.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 84.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- 90 Central African Republic 75.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Trinidad and Tobago 72.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 92 Zambia 67.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 94 Tanzania, United Republic of 61.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 95 Myanmar 60.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 96 Uzbekistan 57.42 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 413,634 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 113.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 60.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 248.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 144.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 87.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 49.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 9.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 50.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the was 63.78 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The highest recorded value was 262.07 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0441 current US$ per square kilometre in 1969.
- How does Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 93rd out of 171 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per rising or falling in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Over the last ten years it is up 64.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo, Democratic Republic of the data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.