Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Democratic Republic of Congo

Democratic Republic of Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 34.62 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
34.62 million current US$
Change on year
up 22.9%
World rank
17th
of 143 countries
All-time high
44.91 million current US$
in 2013
All-time low
10,000 current US$
in 1966
Years of data
60
1964–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Democratic Republic of Congo, 1964–2023

010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196419932023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Democratic Republic of Congo stood at 34.62 million current US$.

That represents a change of up 22.9% on the previous year and down 22.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Democratic Republic of Congo peaked at 44.91 million current US$ in 2013 and was at its lowest, 10,000 current US$, in 1966.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 17th of 143 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Democratic Republic of Congo, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled in Democratic Republic of Congo, 1964 to 2023.
Year current US$ Change
1964 100,000 current US$
1965 55,000 current US$ -45.0%
1966 10,000 current US$ -81.8%
1967 50,000 current US$ +400.0%
1968 90,000 current US$ +80.0%
1969 300,000 current US$ +233.3%
1970 140,000 current US$ -53.3%
1971 100,000 current US$ -28.6%
1972 240,000 current US$ +140.0%
1973 340,000 current US$ +41.7%
1974 300,000 current US$ -11.8%
1975 330,000 current US$ +10.0%
1976 280,000 current US$ -15.2%
1977 110,000 current US$ -60.7%
1978 190,000 current US$ +72.7%
1979 250,000 current US$ +31.6%
1980 150,000 current US$ -40.0%
1981 320,000 current US$ +113.3%
1982 590,000 current US$ +84.4%
1983 540,000 current US$ -8.5%
1984 590,000 current US$ +9.3%
1985 950,000 current US$ +61.0%
1986 500,000 current US$ -47.4%
1987 930,000 current US$ +86.0%
1988 1.00 million current US$ +7.5%
1989 440,000 current US$ -56.0%
1990 220,000 current US$ -50.0%
1991 800,000 current US$ +263.6%
1992 750,000 current US$ -6.2%
1993 830,000 current US$ +10.7%
1994 1.26 million current US$ +51.8%
1995 1.91 million current US$ +51.6%
1996 6.29 million current US$ +229.3%
1997 7.94 million current US$ +26.2%
1998 2.54 million current US$ -68.0%
1999 2.22 million current US$ -12.6%
2000 5.66 million current US$ +155.0%
2001 3.87 million current US$ -31.6%
2002 12.47 million current US$ +222.2%
2003 17.10 million current US$ +37.1%
2004 18.00 million current US$ +5.3%
2005 19.29 million current US$ +7.2%
2006 20.71 million current US$ +7.4%
2007 23.33 million current US$ +12.7%
2008 34.88 million current US$ +49.5%
2009 28.05 million current US$ -19.6%
2010 28.30 million current US$ +0.9%
2011 31.82 million current US$ +12.4%
2012 32.57 million current US$ +2.3%
2013 44.91 million current US$ +37.9%
2014 35.94 million current US$ -20.0%
2015 24.35 million current US$ -32.2%
2016 18.46 million current US$ -24.2%
2017 28.82 million current US$ +56.1%
2018 32.75 million current US$ +13.7%
2019 24.38 million current US$ -25.5%
2020 31.26 million current US$ +28.2%
2021 30.43 million current US$ -2.7%
2022 28.17 million current US$ -7.4%
2023 34.62 million current US$ +22.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 100,833 current US$ 10,000 current US$ 300,000 current US$ 6
1970s 228,000 current US$ 100,000 current US$ 340,000 current US$ 10
1980s 601,000 current US$ 150,000 current US$ 1.00 million current US$ 10
1990s 2.48 million current US$ 220,000 current US$ 7.94 million current US$ 10
2000s 18.34 million current US$ 3.87 million current US$ 34.88 million current US$ 10
2010s 30.23 million current US$ 18.46 million current US$ 44.91 million current US$ 10
2020s 31.12 million current US$ 28.17 million current US$ 34.62 million current US$ 4

Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo

  1. 14 Lebanon 43.06 million current US$ compare
  2. 15 Colombia 42.42 million current US$ compare
  3. 16 Uganda 41.41 million current US$ compare
  4. 18 Nepal 33.10 million current US$ compare
  5. 19 Myanmar 32.65 million current US$ compare
  6. 20 Yemen 30.53 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Democratic Republic of Congo

All data for Democratic Republic of Congo →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Democratic Republic of Congo?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Democratic Republic of Congo was 34.62 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
The highest recorded value was 44.91 million current US$ in 2013.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
The lowest recorded value was 10,000 current US$ in 1966.
How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 17th out of 143 countries with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Democratic Republic of Congo?
Over the last ten years it is down 22.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 60 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Democratic Republic of Congo. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Democratic Republic of Congo</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.