Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Nepal
Nepal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 33.10 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Nepal, 1964–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Nepal is 33.10 million current US$, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 2.2% on the previous year and up 2.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Nepal peaked at 61.03 million current US$ in 2015 and was at its lowest, 20,000 current US$, in 1969.
That places Nepal 18th out of 143 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Nepal, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 30,000 current US$ | — |
| 1965 | 40,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1966 | 50,000 current US$ | +25.0% |
| 1967 | 60,000 current US$ | +20.0% |
| 1968 | 70,000 current US$ | +16.7% |
| 1969 | 20,000 current US$ | -71.4% |
| 1970 | 30,000 current US$ | +50.0% |
| 1971 | 40,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1972 | 50,000 current US$ | +25.0% |
| 1973 | 300,000 current US$ | +500.0% |
| 1974 | 420,000 current US$ | +40.0% |
| 1975 | 180,000 current US$ | -57.1% |
| 1976 | 400,000 current US$ | +122.2% |
| 1977 | 380,000 current US$ | -5.0% |
| 1978 | 570,000 current US$ | +50.0% |
| 1979 | 410,000 current US$ | -28.1% |
| 1980 | 320,000 current US$ | -22.0% |
| 1981 | 820,000 current US$ | +156.2% |
| 1982 | 2.46 million current US$ | +200.0% |
| 1983 | 1.59 million current US$ | -35.4% |
| 1984 | 1.42 million current US$ | -10.7% |
| 1985 | 1.96 million current US$ | +38.0% |
| 1986 | 3.91 million current US$ | +99.5% |
| 1987 | 3.07 million current US$ | -21.5% |
| 1988 | 3.76 million current US$ | +22.5% |
| 1989 | 4.98 million current US$ | +32.4% |
| 1990 | 9.75 million current US$ | +95.8% |
| 1991 | 5.83 million current US$ | -40.2% |
| 1992 | 8.58 million current US$ | +47.2% |
| 1993 | 7.10 million current US$ | -17.2% |
| 1994 | 5.15 million current US$ | -27.5% |
| 1995 | 3.76 million current US$ | -27.0% |
| 1996 | 11.20 million current US$ | +197.9% |
| 1997 | 7.67 million current US$ | -31.5% |
| 1998 | 8.81 million current US$ | +14.9% |
| 1999 | 7.40 million current US$ | -16.0% |
| 2000 | 8.91 million current US$ | +20.4% |
| 2001 | 11.49 million current US$ | +29.0% |
| 2002 | 13.11 million current US$ | +14.1% |
| 2003 | 20.22 million current US$ | +54.2% |
| 2004 | 23.02 million current US$ | +13.8% |
| 2005 | 25.12 million current US$ | +9.1% |
| 2006 | 40.96 million current US$ | +63.1% |
| 2007 | 40.90 million current US$ | -0.1% |
| 2008 | 41.90 million current US$ | +2.4% |
| 2009 | 45.31 million current US$ | +8.1% |
| 2010 | 47.21 million current US$ | +4.2% |
| 2011 | 49.40 million current US$ | +4.6% |
| 2012 | 40.63 million current US$ | -17.8% |
| 2013 | 32.44 million current US$ | -20.2% |
| 2014 | 42.00 million current US$ | +29.5% |
| 2015 | 61.03 million current US$ | +45.3% |
| 2016 | 30.72 million current US$ | -49.7% |
| 2017 | 32.29 million current US$ | +5.1% |
| 2018 | 32.86 million current US$ | +1.7% |
| 2019 | 25.60 million current US$ | -22.1% |
| 2020 | 32.77 million current US$ | +28.0% |
| 2021 | 39.68 million current US$ | +21.1% |
| 2022 | 33.85 million current US$ | -14.7% |
| 2023 | 33.10 million current US$ | -2.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 45,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | 6 |
| 1970s | 278,000 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 570,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.43 million current US$ | 320,000 current US$ | 4.98 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.53 million current US$ | 3.76 million current US$ | 11.20 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 27.09 million current US$ | 8.91 million current US$ | 45.31 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 39.42 million current US$ | 25.60 million current US$ | 61.03 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 34.85 million current US$ | 32.77 million current US$ | 39.68 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Nepal
More aid effectiveness data for Nepal
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 4.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 339,536 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 49.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 35.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 47.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 65.44 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Nepal?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Nepal was 33.10 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Nepal?
- The highest recorded value was 61.03 million current US$ in 2015.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Nepal?
- The lowest recorded value was 20,000 current US$ in 1969.
- How does Nepal rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Nepal ranks 18th out of 143 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Nepal?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Nepal data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 60 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.