Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Uganda
Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps was 41.41 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Uganda, 1964–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Uganda stood at 41.41 million current US$.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.1% on the previous year and down 40.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Uganda peaked at 80.97 million current US$ in 2011 and was at its lowest, 180,000 current US$, in 1964.
That places Uganda 16th out of 143 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps in Uganda, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 180,000 current US$ | — |
| 1965 | 250,000 current US$ | +38.9% |
| 1966 | 350,000 current US$ | +40.0% |
| 1967 | 580,000 current US$ | +65.7% |
| 1968 | 700,000 current US$ | +20.7% |
| 1969 | 700,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 980,000 current US$ | +40.0% |
| 1971 | 1.16 million current US$ | +18.4% |
| 1972 | 1.83 million current US$ | +57.8% |
| 1973 | 360,000 current US$ | -80.3% |
| 1979 | 910,000 current US$ | +152.8% |
| 1980 | 390,000 current US$ | -57.1% |
| 1981 | 1.16 million current US$ | +197.4% |
| 1982 | 7.00 million current US$ | +503.4% |
| 1983 | 1.20 million current US$ | -82.9% |
| 1984 | 1.06 million current US$ | -11.7% |
| 1985 | 1.15 million current US$ | +8.5% |
| 1986 | 2.20 million current US$ | +91.3% |
| 1987 | 2.65 million current US$ | +20.5% |
| 1988 | 3.46 million current US$ | +30.6% |
| 1989 | 4.54 million current US$ | +31.2% |
| 1990 | 7.35 million current US$ | +61.9% |
| 1991 | 5.20 million current US$ | -29.3% |
| 1992 | 9.90 million current US$ | +90.4% |
| 1993 | 13.30 million current US$ | +34.3% |
| 1994 | 19.29 million current US$ | +45.0% |
| 1995 | 20.48 million current US$ | +6.2% |
| 1996 | 21.21 million current US$ | +3.6% |
| 1997 | 27.81 million current US$ | +31.1% |
| 1998 | 31.29 million current US$ | +12.5% |
| 1999 | 25.45 million current US$ | -18.7% |
| 2000 | 21.00 million current US$ | -17.5% |
| 2001 | 19.73 million current US$ | -6.0% |
| 2002 | 32.62 million current US$ | +65.3% |
| 2003 | 38.37 million current US$ | +17.6% |
| 2004 | 41.67 million current US$ | +8.6% |
| 2005 | 45.53 million current US$ | +9.3% |
| 2006 | 50.46 million current US$ | +10.8% |
| 2007 | 69.77 million current US$ | +38.3% |
| 2008 | 74.98 million current US$ | +7.5% |
| 2009 | 67.32 million current US$ | -10.2% |
| 2010 | 71.45 million current US$ | +6.1% |
| 2011 | 80.97 million current US$ | +13.3% |
| 2012 | 52.57 million current US$ | -35.1% |
| 2013 | 69.97 million current US$ | +33.1% |
| 2014 | 65.07 million current US$ | -7.0% |
| 2015 | 44.60 million current US$ | -31.5% |
| 2016 | 43.70 million current US$ | -2.0% |
| 2017 | 29.87 million current US$ | -31.7% |
| 2018 | 35.34 million current US$ | +18.3% |
| 2019 | 35.54 million current US$ | +0.6% |
| 2020 | 33.19 million current US$ | -6.6% |
| 2021 | 32.82 million current US$ | -1.1% |
| 2022 | 39.76 million current US$ | +21.2% |
| 2023 | 41.41 million current US$ | +4.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 460,000 current US$ | 180,000 current US$ | 700,000 current US$ | 6 |
| 1970s | 1.05 million current US$ | 360,000 current US$ | 1.83 million current US$ | 5 |
| 1980s | 2.48 million current US$ | 390,000 current US$ | 7.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 18.13 million current US$ | 5.20 million current US$ | 31.29 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 46.15 million current US$ | 19.73 million current US$ | 74.98 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 52.91 million current US$ | 29.87 million current US$ | 80.97 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 36.79 million current US$ | 32.82 million current US$ | 41.41 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Uganda
More aid effectiveness data for Uganda
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 7.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 23.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 26.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 124.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.15 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 103.69 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -2.29 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 31.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 6.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 56.93 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Uganda?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps in Uganda was 41.41 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 80.97 million current US$ in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was 180,000 current US$ in 1964.
- How does Uganda rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Uganda ranks 16th out of 143 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Uganda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 40.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.