Africa Western and Central vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per

Africa Western and Central
4.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
Zimbabwe
29.77 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Africa Western and Central rank
20th
Zimbabwe rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per over time

  • Africa Western and Central
  • Zimbabwe
010203040197519992023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 29.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Africa Western and Central, a difference of 25.2 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 6.5 times Africa Western and Central's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Africa Western and Central ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 46 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Western and Central Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0255 current US$ per square kilometre 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.297 current US$ per square kilometre 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre 17.8 current US$ per square kilometre 15.02 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 4.36 current US$ per square kilometre 20.82 current US$ per square kilometre 16.46 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, Africa Western and Central or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 29.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Africa Western and Central as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between Africa Western and Central and Zimbabwe?
25.2 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Western and Central and Zimbabwe?
39 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2019.
How do Africa Western and Central and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
Africa Western and Central ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Western and Central vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/africa-western-and-central/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/africa-western-and-central/zimbabwe/">Africa Western and Central vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,232 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.