South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per

South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
3.31 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Zimbabwe
29.77 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
23rd
Zimbabwe rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per over time

  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
  • Zimbabwe
010203040197419982023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 29.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 26.46 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 9.0 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 46 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0699 current US$ per square kilometre 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.4865 current US$ per square kilometre 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre 17.8 current US$ per square kilometre 13.18 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre 20.82 current US$ per square kilometre 17.41 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 3.16 current US$ per square kilometre 28.19 current US$ per square kilometre 25.04 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 29.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?
26.46 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?
42 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2022.
How do South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 21st of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/">South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,232 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.