Georgia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per

Georgia
8.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
7.98 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
69th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
71st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per over time

  • Georgia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
050100150200196419932023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.52 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 69th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 71st of 153 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 20.05 current US$ per square kilometre 13.71 current US$ per square kilometre 6.34 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 22.62 current US$ per square kilometre 18.61 current US$ per square kilometre 4.01 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre 7.7 current US$ per square kilometre 4.96 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre 9.67 current US$ per square kilometre 3.44 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per, Georgia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Georgia, at 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per between Georgia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.52 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
Georgia ranks 69th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 71st of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/tanzania/">Georgia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,332 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.