Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
7.98 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 33.0%
World rank
71st
of 153 countries
All-time high
221 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1987
All-time low
-1.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1974
Years of data
59
1964–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1964–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of is 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 33.0% on the previous year and up 7.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 221 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987 and was at its lowest, -1.72 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1974.
That places Tanzania, United Republic of 71st out of 153 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1967 | 10.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +90000.3% |
| 1968 | 7.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 1969 | -0.2709 current US$ per square kilometre | -103.8% |
| 1970 | 5.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -2175.0% |
| 1971 | 3.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 1972 | -1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -131.3% |
| 1973 | -1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 1974 | -1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1975 | -0.3725 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.3% |
| 1976 | 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre | -103.0% |
| 1977 | -0.4177 current US$ per square kilometre | -3800.0% |
| 1978 | -0.2597 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 1979 | -0.429 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.2% |
| 1980 | 0.5193 current US$ per square kilometre | -221.1% |
| 1981 | 11.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +2184.8% |
| 1982 | 15.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 1983 | 21.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.6% |
| 1984 | 41.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.8% |
| 1985 | 39.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1986 | 31.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 1987 | 221 current US$ per square kilometre | +596.9% |
| 1988 | 86.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.7% |
| 1989 | 69 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1990 | 119.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.9% |
| 1991 | 42.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.3% |
| 1992 | 74.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.5% |
| 1993 | 25.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.5% |
| 1994 | 11.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.3% |
| 1995 | 7.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 1996 | 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.9% |
| 1997 | 4.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 1998 | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1999 | 38.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +893.3% |
| 2000 | 0.779 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.0% |
| 2001 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.8% |
| 2002 | 149.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +8658.3% |
| 2003 | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.0% |
| 2004 | 5.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +277.6% |
| 2005 | 5.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2006 | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.5% |
| 2007 | 4.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.4% |
| 2008 | 6.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.9% |
| 2009 | 7.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2010 | 5.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 2011 | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.0% |
| 2012 | 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2013 | 7.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2014 | 5.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.7% |
| 2015 | 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2016 | 6.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 2017 | 6.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 13.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.8% |
| 2019 | 11.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 2020 | 9.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 2021 | 8.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2022 | 11.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 2023 | 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2709 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 0.3488 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 53.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5193 current US$ per square kilometre | 221 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 33.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 119.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 18.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.779 current US$ per square kilometre | 149.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 68 Côte d'Ivoire 8.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 69 Georgia 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 70 Nepal 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 72 Kyrgyzstan 7.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 73 India 7.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 74 Egypt 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 37.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 34.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 54.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 121.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 16.94 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Tanzania, United Republic of was 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 221 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 1974.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 71st out of 153 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.