Hong Kong, China vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per

Hong Kong, China
47.62 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Mozambique
42.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
30th
Mozambique rank
33rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Mozambique
0200400600196719952023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre against 42.68 current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 30th and Mozambique ranks 33rd of 153 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s 9.85 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0127 current US$ per square kilometre 9.84 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 30.29 current US$ per square kilometre 62.35 current US$ per square kilometre 32.07 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 57.14 current US$ per square kilometre 39.24 current US$ per square kilometre 17.91 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per, Hong Kong, China or Mozambique?
Hong Kong, China, at 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre against 42.68 current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per between Hong Kong, China and Mozambique?
4.94 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Mozambique?
10 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Mozambique rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 30th and Mozambique ranks 33rd of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/mozambique/">Hong Kong, China vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,332 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.