Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Hong Kong, China
Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Hong Kong, China, 1967–1996
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Hong Kong, China recorded 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in 1996.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 28.6% on the previous year and down 5.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Hong Kong, China peaked at 70.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987 and was at its lowest, 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1967.
Hong Kong, China ranks 30th of 153 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Hong Kong, China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1967 | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 9.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1981 | 10 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1983 | 20.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.0% |
| 1984 | 20.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 10.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1986 | 50.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1987 | 70.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1995 | 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1996 | 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1970s | 9.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1980s | 30.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 current US$ per square kilometre | 70.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1990s | 57.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Hong Kong, China
- 27 Ethiopia 67.06 current US$ per square kilometre
- 28 Burundi 61.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Djibouti 60.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Ukraine 46.97 current US$ per square kilometre
- 32 Türkiye 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Mozambique 42.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Hong Kong, China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 70,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10,000 current US$ (1992)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 800,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 30,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.57 million current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.06 million current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 120,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 50,000 current US$ (1996)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.86 million current US$ (1996)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Hong Kong, China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Hong Kong, China was 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The highest recorded value was 70.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 1987.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 1967.
- How does Hong Kong, China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 30th out of 153 countries with data for 1996.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Hong Kong, China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hong Kong, China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.