Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Turkey
Turkey: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
43.41 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 11.4%
World rank
32nd
of 153 countries
All-time high
145.19 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
All-time low
-13.98 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2006
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Turkey, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Turkey stood at 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 11.4% on the previous year and up 1,174.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Turkey peaked at 145.19 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, -13.98 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2006.
That places Turkey 32nd out of 153 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Turkey, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 6.64 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -2.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -139.9% |
| 1963 | 8.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -438.7% |
| 1964 | -6.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -167.3% |
| 1965 | -8.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 1966 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -182.8% |
| 1967 | 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +153.2% |
| 1968 | 16.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1969 | 27.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.2% |
| 1970 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.4% |
| 1971 | 26.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +1395.7% |
| 1972 | -6.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -123.0% |
| 1973 | 9.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -249.6% |
| 1974 | -8.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -190.7% |
| 1975 | -9.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1976 | 10.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -213.9% |
| 1977 | -5.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -147.3% |
| 1978 | 0.4937 current US$ per square kilometre | -109.7% |
| 1979 | 0.2859 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.1% |
| 1980 | 0.7406 current US$ per square kilometre | +159.1% |
| 1981 | 0.6627 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1982 | 26.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +3935.3% |
| 1983 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.2% |
| 1984 | 23.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +784.7% |
| 1985 | 28.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1986 | 25.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1987 | -0.3378 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.4% |
| 1988 | 0.1949 current US$ per square kilometre | -157.7% |
| 1989 | -7.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -3906.7% |
| 1990 | 28.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -483.7% |
| 1991 | 26.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1992 | 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +153.9% |
| 1993 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.2% |
| 1994 | -3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -417.0% |
| 1995 | -7.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.3% |
| 1996 | -5.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.7% |
| 1997 | -7.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 1998 | -2.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.2% |
| 1999 | -1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2000 | -2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.9% |
| 2001 | -1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 2002 | -5.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +190.1% |
| 2003 | -8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.6% |
| 2004 | -9.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2005 | -6.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 2006 | -13.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +114.8% |
| 2007 | -8.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.3% |
| 2008 | -7.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2009 | -7.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2010 | -6.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 2011 | -4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.0% |
| 2012 | -4.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2013 | -4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2014 | -4 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2015 | -1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.4% |
| 2016 | 89.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -4915.2% |
| 2017 | 145.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.8% |
| 2018 | 77.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.9% |
| 2019 | 51.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 2020 | 50.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2021 | 31.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 2022 | 38.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 2023 | 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 10.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 9.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -7.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 145.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 41.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Turkey
- 29 Djibouti 60.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Hong Kong 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Ukraine 46.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Mozambique 42.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Burkina Faso 33.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Uganda 33.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Turkey
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 35.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 8.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 22.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 633.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 7.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 38.30 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 30.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 42.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 31.67 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Turkey?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Turkey was 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Turkey?
- The highest recorded value was 145.19 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Turkey?
- The lowest recorded value was -13.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- How does Turkey rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Turkey ranks 32nd out of 153 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Turkey?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,174.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Turkey data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.