Mauritius vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per

Mauritius
275.59 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
202.62 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
13th
Tunisia rank
16th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Tunisia
-25002505007501.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 275.59 current US$ per square kilometre against 202.62 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 72.97 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.4 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Tunisia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 13th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 153 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 19.7 current US$ per square kilometre 54.52 current US$ per square kilometre 34.81 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 128.08 current US$ per square kilometre 294.25 current US$ per square kilometre 166.17 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 12.32 current US$ per square kilometre 494.95 current US$ per square kilometre 482.63 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 8.21 current US$ per square kilometre 29.09 current US$ per square kilometre 20.88 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 10.32 current US$ per square kilometre 254.44 current US$ per square kilometre 244.12 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 73.19 current US$ per square kilometre 350.63 current US$ per square kilometre 277.44 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per, Mauritius or Tunisia?
Mauritius, at 275.59 current US$ per square kilometre against 202.62 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per between Mauritius and Tunisia?
72.97 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Tunisia?
20 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Tunisia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
Mauritius ranks 13th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tunisia/">Mauritius vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,332 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.