Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Tunisia
Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 202.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
202.62 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 26.1%
World rank
16th
of 153 countries
All-time high
1,033 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1992
All-time low
-127.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Tunisia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Tunisia stood at 202.62 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 26.1% on the previous year and up 85.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Tunisia peaked at 1,033 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, -127.96 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1999.
That places Tunisia 16th out of 153 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1287 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +1350.0% |
| 1963 | 93.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +4934.5% |
| 1964 | -7.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -108.1% |
| 1965 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -117.8% |
| 1966 | -5.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -485.7% |
| 1967 | 128.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -2566.7% |
| 1968 | -3.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.4% |
| 1969 | 10.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -431.2% |
| 1970 | 11.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1971 | 14.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 1972 | -23.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -264.8% |
| 1973 | 88.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -481.4% |
| 1974 | 50.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 1975 | 24.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.5% |
| 1976 | 118.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +392.0% |
| 1977 | 20.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.9% |
| 1978 | -15.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -175.9% |
| 1979 | -22.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.3% |
| 1980 | -17.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.9% |
| 1981 | -11.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.2% |
| 1982 | 14.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -234.5% |
| 1983 | 73.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +399.6% |
| 1984 | 57.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 1985 | 147.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.5% |
| 1986 | 227.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.5% |
| 1987 | 557.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.7% |
| 1988 | 481.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 1989 | 173.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.0% |
| 1990 | 419.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +141.6% |
| 1991 | 660.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.5% |
| 1992 | 1,033 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.4% |
| 1993 | 255.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.2% |
| 1994 | 20.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.8% |
| 1995 | -42.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -304.9% |
| 1996 | 12.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -128.5% |
| 1997 | -108.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -989.4% |
| 1998 | -125.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1999 | -127.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2000 | -83.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.1% |
| 2001 | 41.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -150.1% |
| 2002 | 6.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.4% |
| 2003 | 14.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.5% |
| 2004 | 128.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +805.0% |
| 2005 | -59.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -146.2% |
| 2006 | 134.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -325.4% |
| 2007 | 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.7% |
| 2008 | -108.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -3597.9% |
| 2009 | 20.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -119.2% |
| 2010 | 55.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +167.8% |
| 2011 | 18.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.0% |
| 2012 | -32.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -272.4% |
| 2013 | 109.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -434.3% |
| 2014 | 125.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2015 | 172.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.7% |
| 2016 | 132.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2017 | 297.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +124.5% |
| 2018 | 177.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.3% |
| 2019 | 288.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.2% |
| 2020 | 582.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.0% |
| 2021 | 343.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.9% |
| 2022 | 274.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 2023 | 202.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 128.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 26.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 118.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 170.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 557.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 199.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -127.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,033 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 9.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -108.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 134.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 134.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 297.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 350.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 202.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 582.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 13 Mauritius 275.59 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Cape Verde 245.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Syrian Arab Republic 205.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Montenegro 177.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Gambia 145.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Senegal 138.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tunisia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 696,474 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 134,083 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 95.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 32.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 213.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 46.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 4.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 31.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 162.74 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Tunisia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Tunisia was 202.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 1,033 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was -127.96 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- How does Tunisia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Tunisia ranks 16th out of 153 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 85.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.