Brazil vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps

Brazil
154.53 million current US$
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
1.70 billion current US$
in 2023
Brazil rank
14th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time

  • Brazil
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
01.0B2.0B3.0B196019912023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 1.70 billion current US$ against 154.53 million current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 1.55 billion current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 11.0 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Brazil ranks 14th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 17th of 173 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 2.54 million current US$ 866,000 current US$ 1.67 million current US$ Brazil
1970s 9.16 million current US$ 58.11 million current US$ 48.95 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 51.06 million current US$ 459.24 million current US$ 408.18 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 81.78 million current US$ 988.97 million current US$ 907.18 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 53.51 million current US$ 1.17 billion current US$ 1.11 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s -24.87 million current US$ 1.60 billion current US$ 1.63 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 120.79 million current US$ 1.51 billion current US$ 1.39 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Brazil or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 1.70 billion current US$ against 154.53 million current US$ in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa?
1.55 billion current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa?
64 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
Brazil ranks 14th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 17th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/sub-saharan-africa/">Brazil vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.