Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Brazil

Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was 154.53 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
154.53 million current US$
Change on year
up 1,636.8%
World rank
14th
of 173 countries
All-time high
247.00 million current US$
in 2021
All-time low
-253.64 million current US$
in 2012
Years of data
64
1960–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Brazil, 1960–2023

-200.0M0200.0M196019912023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Brazil stood at 154.53 million current US$.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1,636.8% on the previous year and up 1,176.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Brazil peaked at 247.00 million current US$ in 2021 and was at its lowest, -253.64 million current US$, in 2012.

That places Brazil 14th out of 173 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Brazil, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled in Brazil, 1960 to 2023.
Year current US$ Change
1960 -2.15 million current US$
1961 -2.36 million current US$ +9.8%
1962 -2.14 million current US$ -9.3%
1963 15.20 million current US$ -810.3%
1964 -2.28 million current US$ -115.0%
1965 28.36 million current US$ -1343.9%
1966 13.01 million current US$ -54.1%
1967 -6.10 million current US$ -146.9%
1968 -7.06 million current US$ +15.7%
1969 -9.08 million current US$ +28.6%
1970 -11.86 million current US$ +30.6%
1971 -12.00 million current US$ +1.2%
1972 -10.72 million current US$ -10.7%
1973 -5.66 million current US$ -47.2%
1974 1.92 million current US$ -133.9%
1975 23.06 million current US$ +1101.0%
1976 18.55 million current US$ -19.6%
1977 28.28 million current US$ +52.5%
1978 34.53 million current US$ +22.1%
1979 25.47 million current US$ -26.2%
1980 20.50 million current US$ -19.5%
1981 31.36 million current US$ +53.0%
1982 50.47 million current US$ +60.9%
1983 27.13 million current US$ -46.2%
1984 35.60 million current US$ +31.2%
1985 40.61 million current US$ +14.1%
1986 32.29 million current US$ -20.5%
1987 82.10 million current US$ +154.3%
1988 66.36 million current US$ -19.2%
1989 124.18 million current US$ +87.1%
1990 64.66 million current US$ -47.9%
1991 39.36 million current US$ -39.1%
1992 63.35 million current US$ +61.0%
1993 79.37 million current US$ +25.3%
1994 89.37 million current US$ +12.6%
1995 100.50 million current US$ +12.5%
1996 65.48 million current US$ -34.8%
1997 61.84 million current US$ -5.6%
1998 104.55 million current US$ +69.1%
1999 149.36 million current US$ +42.9%
2000 169.61 million current US$ +13.6%
2001 106.11 million current US$ -37.4%
2002 117.60 million current US$ +10.8%
2003 92.21 million current US$ -21.6%
2004 41.71 million current US$ -54.8%
2005 30.75 million current US$ -26.3%
2006 -13.06 million current US$ -142.5%
2007 -9.91 million current US$ -24.1%
2008 93.28 million current US$ -1041.3%
2009 -93.21 million current US$ -199.9%
2010 -62.65 million current US$ -32.8%
2011 157.20 million current US$ -350.9%
2012 -253.64 million current US$ -261.3%
2013 -14.35 million current US$ -94.3%
2014 15.38 million current US$ -207.2%
2015 3.67 million current US$ -76.1%
2016 -14.15 million current US$ -485.6%
2017 -38.19 million current US$ +169.9%
2018 -13.06 million current US$ -65.8%
2019 -28.88 million current US$ +121.1%
2020 72.73 million current US$ -351.9%
2021 247.00 million current US$ +239.6%
2022 8.90 million current US$ -96.4%
2023 154.53 million current US$ +1636.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 2.54 million current US$ -9.08 million current US$ 28.36 million current US$ 10
1970s 9.16 million current US$ -12.00 million current US$ 34.53 million current US$ 10
1980s 51.06 million current US$ 20.50 million current US$ 124.18 million current US$ 10
1990s 81.78 million current US$ 39.36 million current US$ 149.36 million current US$ 10
2000s 53.51 million current US$ -93.21 million current US$ 169.61 million current US$ 10
2010s -24.87 million current US$ -253.64 million current US$ 157.20 million current US$ 10
2020s 120.79 million current US$ 8.90 million current US$ 247.00 million current US$ 4

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 11 Ecuador 180.24 million current US$ compare
  2. 12 Afghanistan 165.64 million current US$ compare
  3. 13 Tunisia 162.74 million current US$ compare
  4. 15 Viet Nam 149.31 million current US$ compare
  5. 16 Republic of Moldova 130.00 million current US$ compare
  6. 17 Côte d'Ivoire 127.97 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 220 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Brazil

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Brazil?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Brazil was 154.53 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 247.00 million current US$ in 2021.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was -253.64 million current US$ in 2012.
How does Brazil rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
Brazil ranks 14th out of 173 countries with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is up 1,176.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Brazil. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Brazil</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.