Czechia vs Oman: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps
Czechia
1.71 million current US$
in 2004
Oman
1.50 million current US$
in 2010
Czechia rank
118th
Oman rank
121st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time
- Czechia
- Oman
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 1.71 million current US$ against 1.50 million current US$ in Oman, a difference of 210,000 current US$.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 118th and Oman ranks 121st of 173 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.80 million current US$ | 6.78 million current US$ | 4.98 million current US$ | Oman |
| 2000s | 1.63 million current US$ | 6.90 million current US$ | 5.27 million current US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Czechia or Oman?
- Czechia, at 1.71 million current US$ against 1.50 million current US$ in Oman as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Czechia and Oman?
- 210,000 current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Oman?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Czechia and Oman rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Czechia ranks 118th and Oman ranks 121st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.