Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Czechia

Czechia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was 1.71 million current US$ in 2004. ▲ Rising

Latest (2004)
1.71 million current US$
Change on year
down 5.5%
World rank
118th
of 173 countries
All-time high
3.31 million current US$
in 1994
All-time low
300,000 current US$
in 1990
Years of data
15
1990–2004

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Czechia, 1990–2004

01.0M2.0M3.0M1990199720041990: 300.0k current US$1991: 900.0k current US$1992: 1.8M current US$1993: 1.5M current US$1994: 3.3M current US$1995: 2.6M current US$1996: 1.9M current US$1997: 2.2M current US$1998: 1.9M current US$1999: 1.7M current US$2000: 1.8M current US$2001: 1.2M current US$2002: 1.6M current US$2003: 1.8M current US$2004: 1.7M current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Czechia is 1.71 million current US$, measured in 2004.

The figure is down 5.5% on the previous year and down 48.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Czechia peaked at 3.31 million current US$ in 1994 and was at its lowest, 300,000 current US$, in 1990.

Czechia ranks 118th of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Czechia, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled in Czechia, 1990 to 2004.
Year current US$ Change
1990 300,000 current US$
1991 900,000 current US$ +200.0%
1992 1.80 million current US$ +100.0%
1993 1.46 million current US$ -18.9%
1994 3.31 million current US$ +126.7%
1995 2.57 million current US$ -22.4%
1996 1.94 million current US$ -24.5%
1997 2.17 million current US$ +11.9%
1998 1.85 million current US$ -14.7%
1999 1.67 million current US$ -9.7%
2000 1.84 million current US$ +10.2%
2001 1.21 million current US$ -34.2%
2002 1.58 million current US$ +30.6%
2003 1.81 million current US$ +14.6%
2004 1.71 million current US$ -5.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 1.80 million current US$ 300,000 current US$ 3.31 million current US$ 10
2000s 1.63 million current US$ 1.21 million current US$ 1.84 million current US$ 5

Countries ranked near Czechia

  1. 115 Croatia 1.88 million current US$ compare
  2. 116 Uruguay 1.87 million current US$ compare
  3. 117 Antigua and Barbuda 1.86 million current US$ compare
  4. 119 Israel 1.61 million current US$ compare
  5. 120 Sao Tome and Principe 1.56 million current US$ compare
  6. 121 Oman 1.50 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 220 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Czechia

All data for Czechia →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Czechia?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Czechia was 1.71 million current US$ in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Czechia?
The highest recorded value was 3.31 million current US$ in 1994.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Czechia?
The lowest recorded value was 300,000 current US$ in 1990.
How does Czechia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
Czechia ranks 118th out of 173 countries with data for 2004.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Czechia?
Over the last ten years it is down 48.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Czechia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Czechia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/czechia/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Czechia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.