Croatia vs Czechia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time
- Croatia
- Czechia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 1.88 million current US$ against 1.71 million current US$ in Czechia, a difference of 170,000 current US$.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Czechia ahead.
Croatia ranks 115th and Czechia ranks 118th of 173 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 194,000 current US$ | 2.04 million current US$ | 1.85 million current US$ | Czechia |
| 2000s | 1.43 million current US$ | 1.63 million current US$ | 196,000 current US$ | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Croatia or Czechia?
- Croatia, at 1.88 million current US$ against 1.71 million current US$ in Czechia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Croatia and Czechia?
- 170,000 current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Czechia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2004.
- How do Croatia and Czechia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Croatia ranks 115th and Czechia ranks 118th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.