Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Croatia

Croatia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was 1.88 million current US$ in 2010. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2010)
1.88 million current US$
Change on year
up 384.8%
World rank
115th
of 173 countries
All-time high
3.24 million current US$
in 2001
All-time low
-890,000 current US$
in 1997
Years of data
16
1995–2010

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Croatia, 1995–2010

-1.0M01.0M2.0M3.0M1995200220101995: 430.0k current US$1996: 120.0k current US$1997: -890.0k current US$1998: 820.0k current US$1999: 490.0k current US$2000: 1.7M current US$2001: 3.2M current US$2002: 510.0k current US$2003: 1.0M current US$2004: 690.0k current US$2005: 480.0k current US$2006: -60.0k current US$2007: 190.0k current US$2008: 10.0k current US$2009: -660.0k current US$2010: 1.9M current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

Croatia recorded 1.88 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in 2010.

The figure is up 384.8% on the previous year and up 8.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Croatia peaked at 3.24 million current US$ in 2001 and was at its lowest, -890,000 current US$, in 1997.

Croatia ranks 115th of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Croatia, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled in Croatia, 1995 to 2010.
Year current US$ Change
1995 430,000 current US$
1996 120,000 current US$ -72.1%
1997 -890,000 current US$ -841.7%
1998 820,000 current US$ -192.1%
1999 490,000 current US$ -40.2%
2000 1.73 million current US$ +253.1%
2001 3.24 million current US$ +87.3%
2002 510,000 current US$ -84.3%
2003 1.00 million current US$ +96.1%
2004 690,000 current US$ -31.0%
2005 480,000 current US$ -30.4%
2006 -60,000 current US$ -112.5%
2007 190,000 current US$ -416.7%
2008 10,000 current US$ -94.7%
2009 -660,000 current US$ -6700.0%
2010 1.88 million current US$ -384.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 194,000 current US$ -890,000 current US$ 820,000 current US$ 5
2000s 713,000 current US$ -660,000 current US$ 3.24 million current US$ 10
2010s 1.88 million current US$ 1.88 million current US$ 1.88 million current US$ 1

Countries ranked near Croatia

  1. 112 Kosovo 2.00 million current US$
  2. 113 Guyana 1.99 million current US$ compare
  3. 114 Gabon 1.95 million current US$ compare
  4. 116 Uruguay 1.87 million current US$ compare
  5. 117 Antigua and Barbuda 1.86 million current US$ compare
  6. 118 Czechia 1.71 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 220 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Croatia

All data for Croatia →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Croatia?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Croatia was 1.88 million current US$ in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Croatia?
The highest recorded value was 3.24 million current US$ in 2001.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Croatia?
The lowest recorded value was -890,000 current US$ in 1997.
How does Croatia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
Croatia ranks 115th out of 173 countries with data for 2010.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Croatia?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Croatia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Croatia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/croatia/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Croatia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.