Honduras vs Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time
- Honduras
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 34.24 million current US$ against 31.86 million current US$ in Honduras, a difference of 2.38 million current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 41st and Romania ranks 40th of 173 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 51.94 million current US$ | 6.15 million current US$ | 45.79 million current US$ | Honduras |
| 2000s | 56.93 million current US$ | 32.78 million current US$ | 24.14 million current US$ | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Honduras or Romania?
- Romania, at 34.24 million current US$ against 31.86 million current US$ in Honduras as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Honduras and Romania?
- 2.38 million current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Romania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Honduras and Romania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Honduras ranks 41st and Romania ranks 40th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.