Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Romania

Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was 34.24 million current US$ in 2004. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2004)
34.24 million current US$
Change on year
down 51.7%
World rank
40th
of 173 countries
All-time high
70.93 million current US$
in 2003
All-time low
230,000 current US$
in 1990
Years of data
15
1990–2004

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Romania, 1990–2004

020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M1990199720041990: 230.0k current US$1991: 750.0k current US$1992: 1.8M current US$1993: 4.1M current US$1994: 6.6M current US$1995: 8.3M current US$1996: 6.2M current US$1997: 5.9M current US$1998: 9.3M current US$1999: 18.3M current US$2000: 19.5M current US$2001: 9.7M current US$2002: 29.6M current US$2003: 70.9M current US$2004: 34.2M current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Romania is 34.24 million current US$, measured in 2004.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 51.7% on the previous year and up 422.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Romania peaked at 70.93 million current US$ in 2003 and was at its lowest, 230,000 current US$, in 1990.

Romania ranks 40th of 173 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Romania, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled in Romania, 1990 to 2004.
Year current US$ Change
1990 230,000 current US$
1991 750,000 current US$ +226.1%
1992 1.78 million current US$ +137.3%
1993 4.07 million current US$ +128.7%
1994 6.56 million current US$ +61.2%
1995 8.31 million current US$ +26.7%
1996 6.22 million current US$ -25.2%
1997 5.91 million current US$ -5.0%
1998 9.31 million current US$ +57.5%
1999 18.34 million current US$ +97.0%
2000 19.50 million current US$ +6.3%
2001 9.67 million current US$ -50.4%
2002 29.58 million current US$ +205.9%
2003 70.93 million current US$ +139.8%
2004 34.24 million current US$ -51.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 6.15 million current US$ 230,000 current US$ 18.34 million current US$ 10
2000s 32.78 million current US$ 9.67 million current US$ 70.93 million current US$ 5

Countries ranked near Romania

  1. 37 Djibouti 43.03 million current US$ compare
  2. 38 Laos 41.74 million current US$ compare
  3. 39 El Salvador 41.44 million current US$ compare
  4. 41 Honduras 31.86 million current US$ compare
  5. 42 Turkey 31.67 million current US$ compare
  6. 43 Bulgaria 28.69 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 220 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Romania

All data for Romania →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Romania?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Romania was 34.24 million current US$ in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Romania?
The highest recorded value was 70.93 million current US$ in 2003.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Romania?
The lowest recorded value was 230,000 current US$ in 1990.
How does Romania rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
Romania ranks 40th out of 173 countries with data for 2004.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Romania?
Over the last ten years it is up 422.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Romania data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Romania. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/romania/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Romania</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.