Romania vs Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time
- Romania
- Türkiye
How they compare
Romania currently reports 34.24 million current US$ against 31.67 million current US$ in Türkiye, a difference of 2.57 million current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Türkiye ahead.
Romania ranks 40th and Türkiye ranks 42nd of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Türkiye in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.15 million current US$ | 73.04 million current US$ | 66.89 million current US$ | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 32.78 million current US$ | 7.80 million current US$ | 24.98 million current US$ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Romania or Türkiye?
- Romania, at 34.24 million current US$ against 31.67 million current US$ in Türkiye as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Romania and Türkiye?
- 2.57 million current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Türkiye?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Romania and Türkiye rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Romania ranks 40th and Türkiye ranks 42nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.