Romania vs Turkey: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current) … Japan gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current) … Japan gaps over time
- Romania
- Turkey
How they compare
Romania currently reports 34.24 million current US$ against 31.67 million current US$ in Turkey, a difference of 2.57 million current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Turkey's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turkey ahead.
Romania ranks 40th and Turkey ranks 42nd of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.15 million current US$ | 73.04 million current US$ | 66.89 million current US$ | Turkey |
| 2000s | 32.78 million current US$ | 7.80 million current US$ | 24.98 million current US$ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Romania or Turkey?
- Romania, at 34.24 million current US$ against 31.67 million current US$ in Turkey as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Romania and Turkey?
- 2.57 million current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Turkey?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Romania and Turkey rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Romania ranks 40th and Turkey ranks 42nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.