Hungary vs Mongolia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time
- Hungary
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 5.03 million current US$ against 4.72 million current US$ in Hungary, a difference of 311,240 current US$.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 96th and Mongolia ranks 93rd of 173 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.89 million current US$ | 69.24 million current US$ | 62.35 million current US$ | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 6.44 million current US$ | 79.56 million current US$ | 73.12 million current US$ | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Hungary or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 5.03 million current US$ against 4.72 million current US$ in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Hungary and Mongolia?
- 311,240 current US$, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Hungary and Mongolia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Hungary ranks 96th and Mongolia ranks 93rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.