Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Hungary

Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps was 4.72 million current US$ in 2004. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2004)
4.72 million current US$
Change on year
down 28.3%
World rank
96th
of 173 countries
All-time high
24.20 million current US$
in 1997
All-time low
-33.56 million current US$
in 1999
Years of data
15
1990–2004

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Hungary, 1990–2004

-40.0M-20.0M020.0M1990199720041990: 2.0M current US$1991: 2.8M current US$1992: 6.2M current US$1993: 10.7M current US$1994: 7.8M current US$1995: 11.4M current US$1996: 17.5M current US$1997: 24.2M current US$1998: 20.1M current US$1999: -33.6M current US$2000: 6.6M current US$2001: 7.4M current US$2002: 6.9M current US$2003: 6.6M current US$2004: 4.7M current US$

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

Hungary recorded 4.72 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in 2004.

That represents a change of down 28.3% on the previous year and down 39.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Hungary peaked at 24.20 million current US$ in 1997 and was at its lowest, -33.56 million current US$, in 1999.

Hungary ranks 96th of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Hungary, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled in Hungary, 1990 to 2004.
Year current US$ Change
1990 1.97 million current US$
1991 2.75 million current US$ +39.6%
1992 6.15 million current US$ +123.6%
1993 10.72 million current US$ +74.3%
1994 7.76 million current US$ -27.6%
1995 11.38 million current US$ +46.6%
1996 17.48 million current US$ +53.6%
1997 24.20 million current US$ +38.4%
1998 20.05 million current US$ -17.1%
1999 -33.56 million current US$ -267.4%
2000 6.60 million current US$ -119.7%
2001 7.42 million current US$ +12.4%
2002 6.89 million current US$ -7.1%
2003 6.58 million current US$ -4.5%
2004 4.72 million current US$ -28.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 6.89 million current US$ -33.56 million current US$ 24.20 million current US$ 10
2000s 6.44 million current US$ 4.72 million current US$ 7.42 million current US$ 5

Countries ranked near Hungary

  1. 93 Mongolia 5.03 million current US$ compare
  2. 94 Russia 4.82 million current US$ compare
  3. 95 Mexico 4.81 million current US$ compare
  4. 97 Colombia 4.32 million current US$ compare
  5. 98 Samoa 4.21 million current US$ compare
  6. 99 Iran 4.17 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 220 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Hungary

All data for Hungary →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Hungary?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps in Hungary was 4.72 million current US$ in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Hungary?
The highest recorded value was 24.20 million current US$ in 1997.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps recorded in Hungary?
The lowest recorded value was -33.56 million current US$ in 1999.
How does Hungary rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
Hungary ranks 96th out of 173 countries with data for 2004.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Hungary?
Over the last ten years it is down 39.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Hungary data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Hungary. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/hungary/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps in Hungary</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.