Central Europe and the Baltics vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Central Europe and the Baltics
1.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Ecuador
725.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
43rd
Ecuador rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Ecuador
0200400600800196219922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 724.02 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 426.2 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Ecuador ranks 44th of 45 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 88.92 current US$ per square kilometre 107.78 current US$ per square kilometre 18.87 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 37.71 current US$ per square kilometre 26.49 current US$ per square kilometre 11.22 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2010s 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre -21.06 current US$ per square kilometre 22.76 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Central Europe and the Baltics or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Central Europe and the Baltics and Ecuador?
724.02 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Ecuador?
21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Ecuador rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Ecuador ranks 44th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/ecuador/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.