Ecuador vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Ecuador
725.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
13.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Ecuador rank
44th
OECD members rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Ecuador
  • OECD members
0200400600800196219922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.53 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 712.19 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 53.7 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was OECD members ahead.

Ecuador ranks 44th and OECD members ranks 41st of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and OECD members in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 16.73 current US$ per square kilometre 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre 13.61 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 38.24 current US$ per square kilometre 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre 34.01 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 107.78 current US$ per square kilometre 7.6 current US$ per square kilometre 100.18 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 26.49 current US$ per square kilometre -0.6244 current US$ per square kilometre 27.11 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s -4.38 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8564 current US$ per square kilometre 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre OECD members
2020s 73.38 current US$ per square kilometre 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre 69.31 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Ecuador or OECD members?
Ecuador, at 725.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.53 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Ecuador and OECD members?
712.19 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and OECD members?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Ecuador ranks 44th and OECD members ranks 41st of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/oecd-members/">Ecuador vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.