Guatemala vs Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Guatemala
150.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Upper middle income
13.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
31st
Upper middle income rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Upper middle income
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 150.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.55 current US$ per square kilometre in Upper middle income, a difference of 137.13 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 11.1 times Upper middle income's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 31st and Upper middle income ranks 32nd of 155 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Upper middle income Difference Ahead
1980s 0.1866 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0112 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1754 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6677 current US$ per square kilometre 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 16.07 current US$ per square kilometre 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre 13.32 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 44.7 current US$ per square kilometre 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre 40.34 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 133.33 current US$ per square kilometre 9.98 current US$ per square kilometre 123.35 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Guatemala or Upper middle income?
Guatemala, at 150.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.55 current US$ per square kilometre in Upper middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Guatemala and Upper middle income?
137.13 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Upper middle income?
34 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Upper middle income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Guatemala ranks 31st and Upper middle income ranks 32nd of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/upper-middle-income/">Guatemala vs Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.