Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 13.55 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Upper middle income stood at 13.55 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 19.5% on the previous year and up 285.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Upper middle income peaked at 13.55 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Upper middle income 32nd out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0.012 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.016 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1989 | 0.0112 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 1990 | 0.028 current US$ per square kilometre | +148.9% |
| 1991 | 0.2108 current US$ per square kilometre | +653.6% |
| 1992 | 0.2637 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.1% |
| 1993 | 0.2653 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1994 | 0.2319 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1995 | 0.5302 current US$ per square kilometre | +128.6% |
| 1996 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +178.3% |
| 1997 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.9% |
| 1998 | 1 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1999 | 0.9504 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2000 | 0.6286 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.9% |
| 2001 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.4% |
| 2002 | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.4% |
| 2003 | 2.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.2% |
| 2004 | 3.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.2% |
| 2005 | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.4% |
| 2006 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 2007 | 3.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2008 | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 2009 | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 2010 | 4.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2011 | 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2012 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2013 | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2014 | 3.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2015 | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2016 | 4.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 2017 | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2018 | 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.1% |
| 2019 | 5.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 2020 | 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2021 | 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.5% |
| 2022 | 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 2023 | 13.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0039 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.016 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6038 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.028 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6286 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 29 Cape Verde 189.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Mauritius 163.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Guatemala 150.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Barbados 139.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Burundi 139.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Uganda 139.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Micronesia, Federated States of 135.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Upper middle income was 13.55 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 13.55 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Upper middle income ranks 32nd out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 285.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.