IBRD only vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

IBRD only
11.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Uganda
139.39 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
36th
Uganda rank
34th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • IBRD only
  • Uganda
050100150198820052023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 139.39 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 128.05 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 12.3 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.

IBRD only ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 34th of 46 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6548 current US$ per square kilometre 4.43 current US$ per square kilometre 3.78 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5959 current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
2010s 6.78 current US$ per square kilometre 81.24 current US$ per square kilometre 74.46 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 9.98 current US$ per square kilometre 144.29 current US$ per square kilometre 134.3 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), IBRD only or Uganda?
Uganda, at 139.39 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between IBRD only and Uganda?
128.05 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Uganda?
33 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
IBRD only ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 34th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/uganda/">IBRD only vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.