Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in IBRD only
IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in IBRD only, 1988–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in IBRD only stood at 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 35 years on record.
That represents a change of up 4.7% on the previous year and up 78.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in IBRD only peaked at 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.012 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1989.
That places IBRD only 36th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in IBRD only, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 0.0142 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0.012 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 1990 | 0.0262 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.3% |
| 1991 | 0.297 current US$ per square kilometre | +1032.8% |
| 1992 | 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 1993 | 0.8496 current US$ per square kilometre | +270.1% |
| 1994 | 0.4968 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.5% |
| 1995 | 0.804 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.8% |
| 1996 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.5% |
| 1997 | 0.9064 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 1998 | 0.5623 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.0% |
| 1999 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.6% |
| 2000 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2001 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.4% |
| 2002 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2003 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2004 | 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.7% |
| 2005 | 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.8% |
| 2006 | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2007 | 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.8% |
| 2008 | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2009 | 4.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2010 | 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 2011 | 5.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2012 | 6.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 2013 | 6.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2014 | 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2015 | 6.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2016 | 7.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2017 | 6.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2018 | 8.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.0% |
| 2019 | 7.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2020 | 7.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2021 | 10.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.2% |
| 2022 | 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0131 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.012 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0142 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1990s | 0.6548 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0262 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near IBRD only
- 33 Burundi 139.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Uganda 139.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Micronesia, Federated States of 135.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Solomon Islands 127.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Bahrain 123.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Ghana 118.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Haiti 102.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for IBRD only
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 312.16 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 136.55 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.62 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 14.43 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 676.02 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7.05 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.49 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 887.01 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 783.59 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.79 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in IBRD only?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in IBRD only was 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in IBRD only?
- The highest recorded value was 11.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in IBRD only?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.012 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- How does IBRD only rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- IBRD only ranks 36th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in IBRD only?
- Over the last ten years it is up 78.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IBRD only data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.