Low & middle income vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Low & middle income
30.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives
442.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
14th
Maldives rank
16th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Maldives
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 442.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 411.81 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Maldives's figure about 14.5 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 14th and Maldives ranks 16th of 46 groups.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Maldives Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0298 current US$ per square kilometre 33.33 current US$ per square kilometre 33.3 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre 225.93 current US$ per square kilometre 224.81 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre 1,515 current US$ per square kilometre 1,510 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 17.63 current US$ per square kilometre 585.15 current US$ per square kilometre 567.52 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 27.03 current US$ per square kilometre 460.8 current US$ per square kilometre 433.77 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Low & middle income or Maldives?
Maldives, at 442.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Low & middle income and Maldives?
411.81 current US$ per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Maldives?
33 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Maldives rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Low & middle income ranks 14th and Maldives ranks 16th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/maldives/">Low & middle income vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.