Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
30.4 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 8.7%
Rank
14th
of 46 groups
All-time high
30.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Low & middle income stood at 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 8.7% on the previous year and up 84.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Low & middle income peaked at 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Low & middle income 14th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0.0201 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.0298 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.2% |
| 1989 | 0.0732 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.6% |
| 1990 | 0.1766 current US$ per square kilometre | +141.1% |
| 1991 | 0.4446 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.8% |
| 1992 | 0.5999 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.9% |
| 1993 | 0.7912 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 1994 | 0.7903 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1995 | 0.9388 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1996 | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.0% |
| 1997 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1998 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1999 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2000 | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2001 | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 2002 | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.7% |
| 2003 | 3.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2004 | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 2005 | 6.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.2% |
| 2006 | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2007 | 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 2008 | 7.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2009 | 7.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2010 | 11.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.3% |
| 2011 | 12.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2012 | 14.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 2013 | 16.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2014 | 17.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2015 | 18.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2016 | 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2017 | 20.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2018 | 21.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2019 | 23.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2020 | 21.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2021 | 28.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.0% |
| 2022 | 27.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2023 | 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0123 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0732 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1766 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 17.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 27.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 11 Palestine, State of 795.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Comoros 682.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Cambodia 642.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 631.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Lebanon 454.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Maldives 442.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Saint Kitts and Nevis 399.81 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Low & middle income was 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 30.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Low & middle income ranks 14th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 84.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.