Sao Tome and Principe vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)

Sao Tome and Principe
342.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
17.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
21st
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
24th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 342.4 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 325.33 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 20.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 21st and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 24th of 155 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 28.27 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5549 current US$ per square kilometre 27.72 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 59.9 current US$ per square kilometre 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre 58.21 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 12.59 current US$ per square kilometre 12.38 current US$ per square kilometre 0.213 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 187.37 current US$ per square kilometre 19.36 current US$ per square kilometre 168.01 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$), Sao Tome and Principe or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 342.4 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) between Sao Tome and Principe and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
325.33 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
17 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 21st and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 24th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-korea-rep-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,273 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.