Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) was 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
17.07 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 22.2%
Rank
24th
of 46 groups
All-time high
21.94 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) recorded 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 22.2% on the previous year and up 60.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) peaked at 21.94 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 24th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0.003 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0.002 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1989 | 0.0958 current US$ per square kilometre | +4725.0% |
| 1990 | 0.4513 current US$ per square kilometre | +371.0% |
| 1991 | 0.2537 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.8% |
| 1992 | 0.5745 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.4% |
| 1993 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.1% |
| 1994 | 0.6177 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.8% |
| 1995 | 0.6648 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1996 | 0.6342 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1997 | 0.491 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 1998 | 0.1422 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0786 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.7% |
| 2000 | 0.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +586.8% |
| 2001 | 0.0678 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.4% |
| 2002 | 0.1201 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.1% |
| 2003 | 0.7142 current US$ per square kilometre | +494.9% |
| 2004 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.6% |
| 2005 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.9% |
| 2006 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2007 | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.7% |
| 2008 | 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.6% |
| 2009 | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2010 | 5.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.8% |
| 2011 | 7.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 2012 | 10.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 2013 | 10.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2014 | 13.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 2015 | 14.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2016 | 16.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2017 | 16.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2018 | 17.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2019 | 17.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2020 | 17.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2021 | 20.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 2022 | 21.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2023 | 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0101 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0958 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.4988 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0786 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0678 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 12.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 19.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- 21 Sao Tome and Principe 342.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Samoa 317.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Lao People's Democratic Republic 287.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Sri Lanka 285.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Viet Nam 252.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Ecuador 233.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Saint Lucia 214.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 121.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 460.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.49 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.04 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 658.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.95 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.40 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 303.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.70 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) was 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 21.94 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 24th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, korea, rep. (current us$) rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 60.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.